Mac Pro Vs Macbook Pro For Video Editing

#Pro Vs Book Pro For Video Editing Pro Quality Editor

Pro Vs Book Pro For Video Editing Pro Quality Editor

What itвЂ™s good at:The Dell and the MacBook Pro 16 are two of the most powerful, most portable laptops that you can use for professional video editing. Just be sure to warn your wallet ahead of time: MacBook Pros are some of the most expensive laptops around. Or the forthcoming Mac Pro.The Pro in their name comes from the more powerful components they use so if you need a fast machine for CPU-intensive tasks like editing video or images, youвЂ™re going to want to invest in a MacBook Pro. I find Final Cut Pro to be the fastest pro quality editor IвЂ™ve Click to expand.The newest MacBook Pros (retina) do not have a CD drive.

1 And with new Metal support, 8K RED RAW transcodes are up to two times faster on Mac Pro, and up to three times faster on MacBook Pro. You want a constant stream of data for video editing, hence FireWire800 or ThunderBolt are preferred.Video editors on 16-inch MacBook Pro will benefit from render performance that is up to 20 faster while editors using iMac Pro will see gains of up to 35. You render files and edit on an external disk, referred to as a scratch disk - preferably not USB at all, since USB sends data in packets. You dont edit and render on the same internal drive that runs the program in the first instance. Those who talk about it not having enough internal storage space dont know what they are talking about. I can use mine (specs in my post above) to edit in Final Cut Pro X perfectly fine.

At home its docked with a larger external display, an external keyboard and mouse, external peripherals etc, and it makes a high spec computer setup, and plenty of people I know edit in this way.So, although the Air is a very cable editing machine, should you get one primarily for editing? No, no you shouldn't.The MacBook Air is a portable machine. Adobe Premiere Pro is a timeline-based video editing software application.I know plenty of people who use a MacBook Air as their only system. 2My 2016 MacBook Pro 15 is connected via Thunderbolt to an external 4K monitor.

They are built and geared more towards being portable workhorse machines.Although the MacBook Pro's may have slightly higher specs, its not only the specs in the machines that you need to consider when choosing one as an editing machine - any MacBook Air or Pro you buy from 2012 onwards is more then adequate enough to edit on. Hence the reason why they are 'Pro'. This means the CPU works harder for longer periods of time, and what does this cause? HEAT.Although the Air has good cooling, and the new Haswell CPUs are much more efficient, the tolerances on the Air arent as good as the Pro range.The MacBook Pros have a better cooling system and can tolerate higher temperatures. For larger projects, whether in iMovie or FCPX, the render files are larger, and the time taken to render is higher. Great for reviewing footage and basic edits.

If its a secondary machine to supplement your main editing machine, then get the Air. Hence the reason why Im waiting on the new MacBook Pro refresh coming in the next month or two, where I will pick up a 15' max spec retina to use as my main workhorse, my main editing machine.So in answer to your question between a MBP and a MBA - if its your primary machine, make in the MacBook Pro. However, I dont feel its built to be a workhorse machine for full on editing. I use it for general surfing, and light edits when I'm out and about. I have one myself - the max spec 11' model.

Mac Pro Vs Macbook Pro For Video Editing